H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Karol Kucera H2H: 2-2

Nicolas Lapentti and Karol Kucera are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Karol Kucera leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2002 St. Poelten third round 6-3 2-6 6-0.

ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 23, 2002* St. Poelten ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #31 6-3 2-6 6-0 Karol Kucera #73 Match data
Mar 13, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Karol Kucera #84 6-2 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #19 Match data
Oct 15, 1999* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Hard Karol Kucera #15 6-2 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #14 Match data
Jan 29, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Nicolas Lapentti #91 7-6(4) 6-7(6) 6-2 0-6 8-6 Karol Kucera #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Karol Kucera #1,540 #6 2,732 1,994 259 230 53.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Karol Kucera
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1991 1–1 50.0% #352 1,509 0 0
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1 1992 0–1 0.0% #210 1,506 0 0
19 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1 1993 1–3 25.0% #159 1,492 0 0
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1 1994 13–13 50.0% #54 1,615 0 0
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1 1995 21–27 43.8% #79 1,623 0 1
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 1996 17–24 41.5% #63 1,656 0 1
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3 1997 33–27 55.0% #24 1,831 0 2
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4 1998 48–27 64.0% #8 1,844 0 4
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5 1999 38–20 65.5% #17 1,851 0 5
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5 2000 22–21 51.2% #73 1,764 0 5
27 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5 2001 11–13 45.8% #101 1,721 0 5
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5 2002 18–16 52.9% #83 1,755 0 5
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5 2003 24–18 57.1% #40 1,764 0 6
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5 2004 9–14 39.1% #91 1,674 0 6
31 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5 2005 3–5 37.5% #310 1,669 0 6
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5