H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs M. Hipfl H2H: 2-0
Nicolas Lapentti holds a 2–0 lead over M. Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2001 Stuttgart third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2001* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-2 6-3 | M. Hipfl | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1999* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-3 6-0 | M. Hipfl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| M. Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Lapentti | M. Hipfl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |