H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Stefan Koubek H2H: 5-2

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 5–2 lead over Stefan Koubek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 4–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2006 Kitzbuhel fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Stefan Koubek
AUT Age 49 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 28, 2006* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #116 6-3 6-3 Stefan Koubek #109 Match data
Jul 16, 2003* Stuttgart ATP 250 R64 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #64 6-4 6-2 Stefan Koubek #66 Match data
Apr 24, 2002* Barcelona ATP 250 R64 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #22 6-4 6-0 Stefan Koubek #44 Match data
Aug 2, 2000* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Stefan Koubek #47 6-4 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #11 Match data
Jan 14, 2000* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #7 4-6 6-0 6-4 Stefan Koubek #40 Match data
Jul 22, 1999* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #22 6-4 6-4 Stefan Koubek #55 Match data
Jul 25, 1997* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Stefan Koubek #171 7-5 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Stefan Koubek #906 #20 1,143 1,794 195 235 45.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Stefan Koubek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1219 1,485 0 0
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1 1996 1–2 33.3% #311 1,481 0 0
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1 1997 4–2 66.7% #125 1,543 0 0
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1 1998 2–4 33.3% #93 1,533 0 0
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 1999 29–25 53.7% #46 1,681 0 1
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3 2000 26–27 49.1% #54 1,627 0 2
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4 2001 20–22 47.6% #63 1,698 0 2
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5 2002 18–31 36.7% #54 1,578 0 2
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5 2003 19–24 44.2% #53 1,647 0 3
27 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5 2004 22–24 47.8% #60 1,754 0 3
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5 2005 6–15 28.6% #182 1,568 0 3
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5 2006 14–9 60.9% #80 1,693 0 3
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5 2007 22–26 45.8% #47 1,760 0 3
31 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5 2008 3–6 33.3% #192 1,703 0 3
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5 2009 6–11 35.3% #135 1,636 0 3
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5 2010 3–5 37.5% #131 1,632 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #647 1,602 0 3