H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 3-1
Nicolas Lapentti holds a 3–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 1999 Indianapolis final 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1999 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1999* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-2 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Nov 1, 1997* | Bogota | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-2 7-5 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| May 17, 1996* | Coral Springs | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Vincent Spadea | 7-5 4-6 4-2 (ret.) | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nicolas Lapentti | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |