H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 1-1
Nicolas Lapentti and Wayne Arthurs are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on clay, while Wayne Arthurs leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2003 Kitzbuhel second round 7-6(8) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2003* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 7-6(8) 6-3 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Wayne Arthurs | 7-5 7-6(7) 7-5 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Lapentti | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |