H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Mahut vs Carlos Berlocq H2H: 1-1

Nicolas Mahut and Carlos Berlocq are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Berlocq won the 2014 Nice round of 16 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Carlos Berlocq
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carlos Berlocq #48 6-2 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #38 Match data May 22, 2014* R16 Nice ATP 250 Clay
Nicolas Mahut #82 6-4 6-1 Carlos Berlocq #81 Match data Apr 27, 2006* R32 Casablanca ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,930 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Carlos Berlocq #505 #37 1,086 1,853 127 187 40.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Mahut Carlos Berlocq
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,446 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #79 1,454 0 0
23 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0 2006 5–17 22.7% #132 1,428 0 0
24 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0 2007 11–15 42.3% #85 1,551 0 0
25 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0 2008 3–16 15.8% #157 1,450 0 0
26 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,645 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,634 0 0 2010 3–3 50.0% #66 1,542 0 0
28 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,663 0 0 2011 15–23 39.5% #60 1,657 0 0
29 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,776 0 0 2012 23–29 44.2% #66 1,656 0 0
30 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,757 0 0 2013 26–24 52.0% #41 1,827 0 1
31 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,852 0 2 2014 17–17 50.0% #72 1,743 0 2
32 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,664 0 2 2015 7–9 43.8% #111 1,693 0 2
33 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3 2016 4–6 40.0% #95 1,734 0 2
34 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,871 0 4 2017 12–19 38.7% #112 1,694 0 2
35 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,754 0 4 2018 1–5 16.7% #139 1,667 0 2
36 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,708 0 4 2019 0–3 0.0% #507 1,505 0 2
37 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Mahut Carlos Berlocq
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2007 0 4 4 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 4 7 11 36.4% 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2012 7 14 21 33.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
30 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2013 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — 2014 1 7 8 12.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
34 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
36 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 133 225 40.9% 17 39 56 30.4% 67 41 108 62.0% 3 11 14 21.4% — 27 57 84 32.1% 94 112 206 45.6% 6 18 24 25.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 401/403 of Nicolas Mahut's and 307/314 of Carlos Berlocq's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Mahut Carlos Berlocq
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 54.1% 65.6% 50.0% 54.2% 34.3% 58.4% 30.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 5/5 9.0 4.0 63.3% 71.4% 45.1% 59.0% 24.9% 61.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1/1 10.0 0.0 59.2% 69.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.3% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 9/9 9.4 5.2 58.3% 71.9% 49.0% 55.7% 32.7% 62.4% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 12/13 7.8 5.1 58.7% 68.5% 42.4% 46.6% 44.2% 57.7% 34.2% 2005 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.5% 68.0% 29.4% 33.3% 0.0% 52.4% 30.8%
23 2005 6/6 7.7 3.3 60.0% 77.5% 44.7% 36.9% 32.6% 64.2% 26.7% 2006 22/22 2.2 3.0 59.9% 60.1% 45.1% 54.3% 54.5% 53.6% 38.5%
24 2006 30/30 7.9 3.4 62.2% 70.5% 48.4% 56.4% 45.6% 62.2% 31.6% 2007 23/26 3.7 1.7 61.9% 66.6% 50.1% 54.9% 40.9% 59.6% 34.5%
25 2007 42/42 7.8 4.9 57.0% 75.5% 52.0% 61.9% 42.1% 65.2% 33.9% 2008 19/19 3.3 2.3 61.7% 63.4% 43.1% 46.0% 40.2% 56.0% 37.5%
26 2008 42/42 9.0 4.2 61.9% 72.6% 49.2% 63.1% 38.8% 63.7% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 8/8 9.0 2.6 62.3% 80.1% 50.1% 63.2% 40.7% 68.9% 35.2% 2010 6/6 1.7 2.3 60.2% 63.2% 48.1% 56.2% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3%
28 2010 10/10 17.8 5.1 64.7% 76.0% 49.3% 66.9% 52.9% 66.5% 29.4% 2011 37/38 4.0 2.9 61.8% 67.3% 48.4% 51.3% 38.1% 59.9% 39.6%
29 2011 22/23 7.3 3.7 59.9% 74.6% 52.0% 61.9% 35.6% 65.3% 37.6% 2012 51/52 3.0 2.6 65.9% 65.3% 50.3% 53.2% 39.2% 59.9% 40.1%
30 2012 34/34 8.0 2.7 60.4% 72.3% 50.5% 64.5% 39.6% 63.8% 32.9% 2013 49/50 3.3 2.3 67.8% 70.4% 50.0% 55.5% 41.8% 63.7% 37.3%
31 2013 24/24 8.5 3.3 59.3% 79.5% 54.2% 71.3% 42.4% 69.1% 39.1% 2014 33/34 3.0 2.4 67.4% 66.7% 49.6% 60.6% 43.9% 61.1% 39.8%
32 2014 37/37 7.7 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 49.9% 55.5% 38.3% 63.6% 33.2% 2015 16/16 4.3 2.1 64.4% 68.4% 48.0% 56.4% 38.8% 61.0% 37.9%
33 2015 21/21 7.4 2.9 62.7% 72.3% 46.6% 58.6% 40.6% 63.0% 36.2% 2016 10/10 2.0 2.3 71.8% 60.9% 43.6% 56.0% 58.7% 56.5% 40.5%
34 2016 43/43 5.3 2.6 60.7% 74.0% 50.5% 58.7% 53.5% 64.9% 35.4% 2017 31/31 2.9 2.9 61.3% 65.2% 49.6% 55.6% 46.2% 59.0% 37.2%
35 2017 33/33 6.5 2.8 61.3% 70.8% 52.4% 60.0% 33.8% 63.7% 33.7% 2018 6/6 3.0 2.0 65.0% 64.3% 46.9% 47.6% 33.3% 58.5% 28.6%
36 2018 13/13 4.3 3.4 61.0% 72.2% 48.5% 54.4% 39.0% 62.9% 34.0% 2019 3/3 2.3 1.7 56.6% 53.3% 46.2% 36.5% 30.5% 50.1% 37.8%
37 2019 7/7 7.1 2.7 59.4% 72.5% 55.1% 71.2% 36.9% 65.8% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 401/403 7.7 3.5 60.6% 73.3% 50.1% 60.0% 41.0% 64.2% 33.9% — 307/314 3.2 2.5 64.3% 65.9% 48.5% 54.1% 42.3% 59.6% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Mahut Carlos Berlocq
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1518 106.3 -0.24 -1.50 0.740 45.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1500 110.5 -0.73 -2.42 0.806 46.0% +14 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1447 95.7 -1.89 -0.35 0.934 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22 2003 1478 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1540 115.6 +0.41 -1.30 0.903 48.1% +28 — — 23.8% -1.38 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 -0.20 2004 1465 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1545 109.2 -3.28 -1.51 0.808 46.2% +20 -80 +2 29.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.6 +0.16 2005 1454 100.8 -2.29 -5.10 0.646 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19
23 2005 1468 108.5 -0.35 -3.57 0.745 46.3% +26 — — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.50 2006 1428 113.9 -5.99 +0.03 0.831 46.6% +61 +41 — 30.6% -1.06 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 +0.77
24 2006 1582 128.9 +0.81 -3.33 0.835 47.0% -87 -146 +113 39.7% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 4–12 (25%) 100.3 -1.54 2007 1551 123.3 -2.82 -1.97 0.854 47.4% -83 +68 -87 44.3% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) 99.9 +1.33
25 2007 1733 136.0 +2.07 -1.43 0.975 49.5% -133 -232 +160 51.4% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 101.5 -1.38 2008 1451 116.8 -4.78 -0.93 0.851 46.7% -26 +71 — 26.1% -1.33 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) 93.2 -0.25
26 2008 1646 139.7 +0.72 -3.30 0.869 48.1% +10 -169 +149 38.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 7–18 (28%) 97.7 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1634 116.4 +1.22 +0.45 1.133 52.1% — — +194 52.6% +0.42 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.02 2010 1542 116.3 -1.42 -0.42 0.848 46.7% — +85 — 42.9% -0.93 1–0 2–0 — +0.01
28 2010 1663 119.6 +0.80 -3.07 0.879 48.7% -81 — +172 41.4% -0.41 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 96.5 -0.59 2011 1658 141.7 -1.96 +1.98 0.989 49.4% -156 +1 -200 41.5% -0.36 5–10 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 97.6 -1.59
29 2011 1776 139.1 +1.77 +0.87 1.085 51.4% 0 — -11 51.9% +0.54 2–2 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -0.18 2012 1657 148.5 -2.64 +2.36 1.001 50.1% -91 +97 -221 45.1% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 7–8 (47%) 103.8 +1.93
30 2012 1758 146.6 +0.71 -2.00 0.908 48.7% -26 -191 +12 47.3% -0.12 4–3 (57%) 9–8 (53%) 101.2 -1.76 2013 1827 157.9 +0.16 +1.05 1.028 50.1% -69 -10 -393 50.0% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 99.6 -1.20
31 2013 1853 136.9 +4.19 +0.90 1.267 53.8% -98 — +138 67.3% +1.11 1–2 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 +0.94 2014 1744 139.2 -1.96 +1.94 1.023 50.5% -88 +143 -297 48.1% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.42
32 2014 1665 136.4 -0.71 -2.67 0.911 48.4% -1 -159 +232 40.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 9–12 (43%) 97.4 +0.82 2015 1693 139.3 -0.88 +1.29 0.973 49.9% -34 +75 — 46.7% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.5 -0.65
33 2015 1767 136.4 -0.11 +0.13 0.976 49.7% -83 -165 +250 55.0% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 11–2 (85%) 105.4 +0.49 2016 1735 126.6 -2.73 +1.14 0.930 49.0% — +95 — 36.4% -0.59 0–1 1–1 — -0.30
34 2016 1872 149.7 +1.33 -0.93 1.009 50.1% -84 -256 +228 52.4% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–11 (45%) 103.5 +1.44 2017 1695 138.3 -3.23 +0.60 0.906 48.3% -51 +53 -241 40.7% -0.74 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.0 -0.39
35 2017 1754 138.7 +0.15 -2.13 0.929 49.1% +26 -152 +157 42.5% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) 100.9 +0.80 2018 1667 119.0 -2.49 -0.73 0.689 44.3% — +27 — 20.0% -1.47 1–0 0–1 — -0.36
36 2018 1708 129.0 -0.69 -0.86 0.916 48.2% +41 — — 33.3% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.4 +0.03 2019 1505 105.1 -3.42 -0.56 0.757 43.8% — +57 — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.25
37 2019 1707 120.2 +0.99 -0.41 1.000 50.7% — -37 +125 54.5% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 98.8 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1668 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1629 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1930 140.6 +0.77 -1.60 0.946 49.2% -34 -161 +146 45.4% -0.20 54–57 (49%) 90–120 (43%) 97.9 -0.46 — 1853 142.9 -2.37 +0.92 0.943 48.9% -77 +59 -245 42.0% -0.41 40–56 (42%) 47–55 (46%) 98.7 -0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.