H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Nicolas Mahut vs Evgeny Korolev H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Mahut holds a 1–0 lead over Evgeny Korolev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Mahut leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters first round 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Mahut | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Evgeny Korolev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Evgeny Korolev | #1,762 | #46 | 1,012 | 1,791 | 72 | 91 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Mahut | Evgeny Korolev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #106 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #140 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #329 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |