H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Mahut vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 2-1

Nicolas Mahut holds a 2–1 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Nicolas Mahut leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2015 US Open second round 6-4 6-2 6-7(4) 6-1.

FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #31 6-4 6-2 6-7(4) 6-1 Nicolas Mahut #64 Match data
Jun 13, 2012* Queen's Club ATP 500 R64 Grass Nicolas Mahut #65 6-4 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #93 Match data
Nov 3, 2011* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Mahut #103 7-6(5) 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,926 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Mahut Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,516 0 0
19 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,498 0 0
20 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,445 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,538 0 0 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,644 0 0 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,633 0 0 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,662 0 0 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,765 0 0 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,754 0 0 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,851 0 2 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,666 0 2 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,869 0 4 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,753 0 4 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,707 0 4 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5
37 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4