H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Nicolas Mahut vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 2-1
Nicolas Mahut holds a 2–1 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicolas Mahut leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Janko Tipsarevic won the 2013 Roland Garros first round 6-2 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-2 7-6(4) 6-1 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Jun 10, 2009* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Nicolas Mahut | 6-0 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2008* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Mahut | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Mahut | Janko Tipsarevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |