H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Mahut vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-2

Nicolas Mahut and Lleyton Hewitt are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Mahut leads 2–0 on grass, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2015 S Hertogenbosch third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 11, 2015* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Nicolas Mahut #97 6-3 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #112 Match data
Jul 14, 2013* Newport ATP 250 F Grass Nicolas Mahut #127 5-7 7-5 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #64 Match data
May 27, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #28 6-4 6-2 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #43 Match data
Jan 10, 2008* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #21 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,926 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Mahut Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,516 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,498 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,445 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,538 0 0 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,644 0 0 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,633 0 0 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,662 0 0 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,765 0 0 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,754 0 0 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,851 0 2 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,666 0 2 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,869 0 4 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,753 0 4 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30
36 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,707 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4 — — — — — — —