H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Mahut vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 2-2
Nicolas Mahut and Paul-Henri Mathieu are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Paul-Henri Mathieu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2016 US Open second round 6-4 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Mahut | 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2016* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Nicolas Mahut | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2014* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 6-3 6-1 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Feb 6, 2014* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 6-1 3-0 (ret.) | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Paul-Henri Mathieu | #914 | #12 | 2,000 | 1,961 | 268 | 297 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Mahut | Paul-Henri Mathieu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #36 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #123 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #33 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #97 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #58 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #129 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #96 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #95 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #249 | 1,574 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |