H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Mahut vs Thomaz Bellucci H2H: 1-2

Thomaz Bellucci holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2017 Sydney International round of 32 6-2 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Thomaz Bellucci
BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Mahut #38 6-2 7-6(2) Thomaz Bellucci #62 Match data Jan 12, 2017* R32 Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Thomaz Bellucci #37 6-4 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #48 Match data May 11, 2016* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Thomaz Bellucci #91 7-6(4) 6-4 6-1 Nicolas Mahut #103 Match data Aug 27, 2014* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,930 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,932 182 204 47.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Mahut Thomaz Bellucci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,446 0 0 2008 3–12 20.0% #85 1,540 0 0
21 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,539 0 0 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1
22 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,796 0 2
23 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,711 0 2
24 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0 2012 24–22 52.2% #33 1,819 0 3
25 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,678 0 3
26 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,645 0 0 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,794 0 3
27 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,634 0 0 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,854 0 4
28 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,663 0 0 2016 17–22 43.6% #61 1,801 0 4
29 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,776 0 0 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,701 0 4
30 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,757 0 0 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,659 0 4
31 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,852 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,664 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,614 0 4
34 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,871 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,754 0 4 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,603 0 4
36 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,708 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Mahut Thomaz Bellucci
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 8 9 11.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 11 13 24 45.8% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 7 13 20 35.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2015 9 14 23 39.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 9 9 18 50.0% 7 11 18 38.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2018 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 133 225 40.9% 17 39 56 30.4% 67 41 108 62.0% 3 11 14 21.4% — 64 94 158 40.5% 112 98 210 53.3% 6 12 18 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 401/403 of Nicolas Mahut's and 375/386 of Thomaz Bellucci's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Mahut Thomaz Bellucci
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 54.1% 65.6% 50.0% 54.2% 34.3% 58.4% 30.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 5/5 9.0 4.0 63.3% 71.4% 45.1% 59.0% 24.9% 61.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1/1 10.0 0.0 59.2% 69.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.3% 32.4% 2008 14/15 6.2 3.5 56.6% 66.0% 50.1% 52.2% 38.9% 58.5% 33.6%
21 2003 9/9 9.4 5.2 58.3% 71.9% 49.0% 55.7% 32.7% 62.4% 33.9% 2009 35/35 6.7 2.6 61.2% 71.4% 51.4% 58.0% 37.9% 63.5% 34.5%
22 2004 12/13 7.8 5.1 58.7% 68.5% 42.4% 46.6% 44.2% 57.7% 34.2% 2010 55/56 7.2 2.8 58.2% 71.4% 50.2% 56.7% 43.0% 62.5% 37.8%
23 2005 6/6 7.7 3.3 60.0% 77.5% 44.7% 36.9% 32.6% 64.2% 26.7% 2011 47/47 6.3 2.7 61.1% 71.6% 49.9% 57.9% 40.4% 63.2% 37.7%
24 2006 30/30 7.9 3.4 62.2% 70.5% 48.4% 56.4% 45.6% 62.2% 31.6% 2012 44/46 5.8 2.8 56.5% 70.7% 52.6% 57.2% 41.6% 62.7% 38.2%
25 2007 42/42 7.8 4.9 57.0% 75.5% 52.0% 61.9% 42.1% 65.2% 33.9% 2013 22/23 6.1 3.5 54.3% 68.1% 51.0% 54.2% 33.5% 60.6% 34.8%
26 2008 42/42 9.0 4.2 61.9% 72.6% 49.2% 63.1% 38.8% 63.7% 31.5% 2014 28/29 6.8 3.3 56.3% 73.0% 51.8% 60.0% 47.9% 63.8% 36.6%
27 2009 8/8 9.0 2.6 62.3% 80.1% 50.1% 63.2% 40.7% 68.9% 35.2% 2015 56/56 5.9 3.5 58.5% 72.0% 52.7% 60.2% 39.5% 63.9% 38.3%
28 2010 10/10 17.8 5.1 64.7% 76.0% 49.3% 66.9% 52.9% 66.5% 29.4% 2016 34/39 4.8 4.1 56.8% 68.9% 51.4% 53.6% 43.7% 61.3% 38.2%
29 2011 22/23 7.3 3.7 59.9% 74.6% 52.0% 61.9% 35.6% 65.3% 37.6% 2017 32/32 4.9 4.3 58.3% 67.2% 51.6% 49.6% 45.3% 60.8% 36.8%
30 2012 34/34 8.0 2.7 60.4% 72.3% 50.5% 64.5% 39.6% 63.8% 32.9% 2018 6/6 4.2 3.3 59.0% 68.8% 49.0% 57.0% 45.5% 60.7% 40.2%
31 2013 24/24 8.5 3.3 59.3% 79.5% 54.2% 71.3% 42.4% 69.1% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 37/37 7.7 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 49.9% 55.5% 38.3% 63.6% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 21/21 7.4 2.9 62.7% 72.3% 46.6% 58.6% 40.6% 63.0% 36.2% 2021 1/1 3.0 3.0 60.9% 59.5% 44.4% 33.3% 11.1% 53.6% 34.3%
34 2016 43/43 5.3 2.6 60.7% 74.0% 50.5% 58.7% 53.5% 64.9% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 33/33 6.5 2.8 61.3% 70.8% 52.4% 60.0% 33.8% 63.7% 33.7% 2023 1/1 0.0 3.0 53.5% 55.3% 51.5% 62.5% 0.0% 53.5% 25.0%
36 2018 13/13 4.3 3.4 61.0% 72.2% 48.5% 54.4% 39.0% 62.9% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 7/7 7.1 2.7 59.4% 72.5% 55.1% 71.2% 36.9% 65.8% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 401/403 7.7 3.5 60.6% 73.3% 50.1% 60.0% 41.0% 64.2% 33.9% — 375/386 6.1 3.2 58.1% 70.5% 51.3% 56.5% 41.2% 62.4% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Mahut Thomaz Bellucci
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1518 106.3 -0.24 -1.50 0.740 45.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1500 110.5 -0.73 -2.42 0.806 46.0% +14 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14 2007 1485 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1447 95.7 -1.89 -0.35 0.934 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22 2008 1541 122.5 -1.95 -2.46 0.810 46.6% -85 +113 — 34.1% -1.14 0–5 (0%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.12
21 2003 1540 115.6 +0.41 -1.30 0.903 48.1% +28 — — 23.8% -1.38 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.20 2009 1782 138.6 +0.15 -2.07 0.944 49.0% -61 -3 — 50.0% -0.28 6–5 (55%) 10–5 (67%) — +0.66
22 2004 1545 109.2 -3.28 -1.51 0.808 46.2% +20 -80 +2 29.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.16 2010 1797 150.7 -0.44 +1.56 1.007 50.0% -63 +117 -167 54.1% +0.16 13–10 (57%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.82
23 2005 1468 108.5 -0.35 -3.57 0.745 46.3% +26 — — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.50 2011 1711 145.3 +0.83 +0.14 1.023 50.1% -61 +227 -72 48.4% -0.07 11–11 (50%) 11–13 (46%) — +2.85
24 2006 1582 128.9 +0.81 -3.33 0.835 47.0% -87 -146 +113 39.7% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 4–12 (25%) — -1.54 2012 1819 150.8 +0.10 +1.17 1.023 50.4% -118 +145 — 51.3% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.64
25 2007 1733 136.0 +2.07 -1.43 0.975 49.5% -133 -232 +160 51.4% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.38 2013 1679 127.7 -1.87 -1.99 0.883 47.7% -32 +132 — 36.2% -0.97 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.53
26 2008 1646 139.7 +0.72 -3.30 0.869 48.1% +10 -169 +149 38.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 7–18 (28%) — -1.66 2014 1794 144.9 +0.75 -0.17 1.011 50.2% -16 +20 — 49.3% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
27 2009 1634 116.4 +1.22 +0.45 1.133 52.1% — — +194 52.6% +0.42 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.02 2015 1855 155.7 +0.52 +2.08 1.061 50.9% -84 +107 — 50.4% +0.01 11–10 (52%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.93
28 2010 1663 119.6 +0.80 -3.07 0.879 48.7% -81 — +172 41.4% -0.41 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.59 2016 1801 145.0 -1.11 +1.56 0.986 49.7% -29 +10 -201 44.1% -0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.79
29 2011 1776 139.1 +1.77 +0.87 1.085 51.4% 0 — -11 51.9% +0.54 2–2 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.18 2017 1702 134.5 -3.07 +0.19 0.937 48.6% -1 +51 — 39.8% -0.67 5–8 (38%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.46
30 2012 1758 146.6 +0.71 -2.00 0.908 48.7% -26 -191 +12 47.3% -0.12 4–3 (57%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.76 2018 1660 117.8 -0.83 -0.48 1.024 50.4% — +58 — 38.9% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.14
31 2013 1853 136.9 +4.19 +0.90 1.267 53.8% -98 — +138 67.3% +1.11 1–2 (33%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.94 2019 1628 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1665 136.4 -0.71 -2.67 0.911 48.4% -1 -159 +232 40.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1767 136.4 -0.11 +0.13 0.976 49.7% -83 -165 +250 55.0% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 11–2 (85%) — +0.49 2021 1614 102.4 -1.27 +1.41 0.740 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03
34 2016 1872 149.7 +1.33 -0.93 1.009 50.1% -84 -256 +228 52.4% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1754 138.7 +0.15 -2.13 0.929 49.1% +26 -152 +157 42.5% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.80 2023 1603 103.9 +1.78 -2.27 0.538 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03
36 2018 1708 129.0 -0.69 -0.86 0.916 48.2% +41 — — 33.3% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1707 120.2 +0.99 -0.41 1.000 50.7% — -37 +125 54.5% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1668 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1629 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1930 140.6 +0.77 -1.60 0.946 49.2% -34 -161 +146 45.4% -0.20 54–57 (49%) 90–120 (43%) 97.9 -0.46 — 1933 149.6 -0.36 +0.43 0.987 49.7% -63 +93 -139 47.2% -0.22 70–83 (46%) 89–86 (51%) 100.1 +0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.