H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Mahut vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-2

Tim Henman holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2007 Las Vegas round robin 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #37 6-1 6-2 Nicolas Mahut #78 Match data Feb 26, 2007 RR Las Vegas International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tim Henman #76 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #78 Match data Jun 16, 2006* R16 Queen's Club Championships ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,930 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Mahut Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,500 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,446 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,539 0 0 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,645 0 0 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,634 0 0 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,663 0 0 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,776 0 0 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,757 0 0 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,852 0 2 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,664 0 2 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11
33 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,871 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,754 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,708 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Mahut Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 133 225 40.9% 17 39 56 30.4% 67 41 108 62.0% 3 11 14 21.4% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 401/403 of Nicolas Mahut's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Mahut Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 54.1% 65.6% 50.0% 54.2% 34.3% 58.4% 30.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 5/5 9.0 4.0 63.3% 71.4% 45.1% 59.0% 24.9% 61.6% 31.0% 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 2002 1/1 10.0 0.0 59.2% 69.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.3% 32.4% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 2003 9/9 9.4 5.2 58.3% 71.9% 49.0% 55.7% 32.7% 62.4% 33.9% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 2004 12/13 7.8 5.1 58.7% 68.5% 42.4% 46.6% 44.2% 57.7% 34.2% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 2005 6/6 7.7 3.3 60.0% 77.5% 44.7% 36.9% 32.6% 64.2% 26.7% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 2006 30/30 7.9 3.4 62.2% 70.5% 48.4% 56.4% 45.6% 62.2% 31.6% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 2007 42/42 7.8 4.9 57.0% 75.5% 52.0% 61.9% 42.1% 65.2% 33.9% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 2008 42/42 9.0 4.2 61.9% 72.6% 49.2% 63.1% 38.8% 63.7% 31.5% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 2009 8/8 9.0 2.6 62.3% 80.1% 50.1% 63.2% 40.7% 68.9% 35.2% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 2010 10/10 17.8 5.1 64.7% 76.0% 49.3% 66.9% 52.9% 66.5% 29.4% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 2011 22/23 7.3 3.7 59.9% 74.6% 52.0% 61.9% 35.6% 65.3% 37.6% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 2012 34/34 8.0 2.7 60.4% 72.3% 50.5% 64.5% 39.6% 63.8% 32.9% 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 2013 24/24 8.5 3.3 59.3% 79.5% 54.2% 71.3% 42.4% 69.1% 39.1% 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 2014 37/37 7.7 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 49.9% 55.5% 38.3% 63.6% 33.2% 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
33 2015 21/21 7.4 2.9 62.7% 72.3% 46.6% 58.6% 40.6% 63.0% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 43/43 5.3 2.6 60.7% 74.0% 50.5% 58.7% 53.5% 64.9% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 33/33 6.5 2.8 61.3% 70.8% 52.4% 60.0% 33.8% 63.7% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 13/13 4.3 3.4 61.0% 72.2% 48.5% 54.4% 39.0% 62.9% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 7/7 7.1 2.7 59.4% 72.5% 55.1% 71.2% 36.9% 65.8% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 401/403 7.7 3.5 60.6% 73.3% 50.1% 60.0% 41.0% 64.2% 33.9% — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Mahut Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1518 106.3 -0.24 -1.50 0.740 45.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1500 110.5 -0.73 -2.42 0.806 46.0% +14 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 2002 1447 95.7 -1.89 -0.35 0.934 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04
21 2003 1540 115.6 +0.41 -1.30 0.903 48.1% +28 — — 23.8% -1.38 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.20 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81
22 2004 1545 109.2 -3.28 -1.51 0.808 46.2% +20 -80 +2 29.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.16 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85
23 2005 1468 108.5 -0.35 -3.57 0.745 46.3% +26 — — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.50 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62
24 2006 1582 128.9 +0.81 -3.33 0.835 47.0% -87 -146 +113 39.7% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 4–12 (25%) — -1.54 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72
25 2007 1733 136.0 +2.07 -1.43 0.975 49.5% -133 -232 +160 51.4% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.38 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25
26 2008 1646 139.7 +0.72 -3.30 0.869 48.1% +10 -169 +149 38.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 7–18 (28%) — -1.66 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30
27 2009 1634 116.4 +1.22 +0.45 1.133 52.1% — — +194 52.6% +0.42 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.02 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21
28 2010 1663 119.6 +0.80 -3.07 0.879 48.7% -81 — +172 41.4% -0.41 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.59 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72
29 2011 1776 139.1 +1.77 +0.87 1.085 51.4% 0 — -11 51.9% +0.54 2–2 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.18 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11
30 2012 1758 146.6 +0.71 -2.00 0.908 48.7% -26 -191 +12 47.3% -0.12 4–3 (57%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.76 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77
31 2013 1853 136.9 +4.19 +0.90 1.267 53.8% -98 — +138 67.3% +1.11 1–2 (33%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.94 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94
32 2014 1665 136.4 -0.71 -2.67 0.911 48.4% -1 -159 +232 40.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.82 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06
33 2015 1767 136.4 -0.11 +0.13 0.976 49.7% -83 -165 +250 55.0% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 11–2 (85%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1872 149.7 +1.33 -0.93 1.009 50.1% -84 -256 +228 52.4% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1754 138.7 +0.15 -2.13 0.929 49.1% +26 -152 +157 42.5% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1708 129.0 -0.69 -0.86 0.916 48.2% +41 — — 33.3% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1707 120.2 +0.99 -0.41 1.000 50.7% — -37 +125 54.5% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1668 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1629 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1930 140.6 +0.77 -1.60 0.946 49.2% -34 -161 +146 45.4% -0.20 54–57 (49%) 90–120 (43%) 97.9 -0.46 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.