H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Massu vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 2-1
Nicolas Massu holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nicolas Massu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Massu won the 2002 Acapulco third round 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2002* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Massu | 6-3 7-6(3) | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| May 25, 2001* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2001* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Massu | 6-1 7-6(1) | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Massu | #1,015 | #9 | 1,845 | 1,900 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Massu | Andrea Gaudenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #87 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #56 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #19 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #44 | 1,728 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2007 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #78 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2009 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,557 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #450 | 1,551 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #876 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |