H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Massu vs Arnaud Clement H2H: 2-2
Nicolas Massu and Arnaud Clement are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Massu leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Arnaud Clement leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2006 Paris Masters second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2006* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Arnaud Clement | 6-1 6-4 | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2001* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Arnaud Clement | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2001* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Massu | 6-2 6-2 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2000 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Massu | 1-6 6-0 6-3 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Massu | #1,015 | #9 | 1,845 | 1,900 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Massu | Arnaud Clement | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #87 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #56 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #19 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #44 | 1,728 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2007 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #78 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2009 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,557 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #450 | 1,551 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #876 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |