H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs David Ferrer H2H: 1-2

David Ferrer holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Massu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Massu won the 2009 Umag fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 2009* Umag ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Massu #85 4-6 6-2 6-4 David Ferrer #20 Match data
Jul 13, 2007* Bastad ATP 250 R16 Clay David Ferrer #15 6-3 3-6 6-3 Nicolas Massu #52 Match data
Apr 19, 2006* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay David Ferrer #15 6-0 4-6 6-2 Nicolas Massu #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 218 217 50.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu David Ferrer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2000 23–21 52.3% #87 1,640 0 0 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,627 0 0 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,861 0 3 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1
24 2004 30–27 52.6% #19 1,738 0 4 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,641 0 4 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,728 0 5 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,619 0 5 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7
28 2008 6–11 35.3% #77 1,583 0 5 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,590 0 5 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,557 0 5 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,551 0 5 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 5 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 5 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26
34 — — — — — — — 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27
36 — — — — — — — 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27
37 — — — — — — — 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27