H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs David Sanchez H2H: 3-3

Nicolas Massu and David Sanchez are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Massu leads 3–2 on clay, while David Sanchez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Sanchez won the 2005 Amersfoort quarterfinal 6-3 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
David Sanchez
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 2005* Amersfoort ATP 250 QF Clay David Sanchez #128 6-3 4-6 6-3 Nicolas Massu #31 Match data
Sep 30, 2004* Palermo ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Massu #12 6-3 6-2 David Sanchez #72 Match data
Sep 14, 2003* Bucharest ATP 250 F Clay David Sanchez #50 6-2 6-2 Nicolas Massu #42 Match data
May 2, 2003* Valencia ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Massu #89 6-4 6-3 David Sanchez #48 Match data
Mar 6, 2003* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard David Sanchez #47 3-6 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Massu #102 Match data
Feb 22, 2002* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Massu #90 6-4 6-3 David Sanchez #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 218 217 50.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5
David Sanchez #1,116 #41 832 1,730 87 119 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu David Sanchez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #262 1,484 0 0
20 2000 23–21 52.3% #87 1,640 0 0 1998 0–2 0.0% #340 1,470 0 0
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,627 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #196 1,459 0 0
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 2000 4–4 50.0% #89 1,520 0 0
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,861 0 3 2001 12–19 38.7% #74 1,569 0 0
24 2004 30–27 52.6% #19 1,738 0 4 2002 19–23 45.2% #60 1,633 0 0
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,641 0 4 2003 23–27 46.0% #50 1,622 0 2
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,728 0 5 2004 20–27 42.6% #74 1,574 0 2
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,619 0 5 2005 9–15 37.5% #137 1,596 0 2
28 2008 6–11 35.3% #77 1,583 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,590 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,557 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,551 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 5 — — — — — — —