H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 2-1

Nicolas Massu holds a 2–1 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Massu leads 2–0 on clay, while Feliciano Lopez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2007 Miami Masters first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 21, 2007* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Feliciano Lopez #84 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Massu #50 Match data
Apr 22, 2004* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nicolas Massu #11 6-2 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #24 Match data
Feb 23, 2002* Buenos Aires ATP 250 SF Clay Nicolas Massu #90 7-6(2) 6-2 Feliciano Lopez #203 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 218 217 50.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2000 23–21 52.3% #87 1,640 0 0 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,627 0 0 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,861 0 3 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2004 30–27 52.6% #19 1,738 0 4 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,641 0 4 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,728 0 5 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,619 0 5 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2008 6–11 35.3% #77 1,583 0 5 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,590 0 5 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,557 0 5 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,551 0 5 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 5 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 5 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7