H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 2-2

Nicolas Massu and Fernando Verdasco are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–1 on clay, while Nicolas Massu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2005 Kitzbuhel semifinal 3-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 30, 2005* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 SF Clay Fernando Verdasco #68 3-6 6-3 7-5 Nicolas Massu #36 Match data
Mar 6, 2004* Acapulco ATP 250 QF Clay Fernando Verdasco #103 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Massu #13 Match data
Feb 12, 2004* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Massu #14 6-1 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #105 Match data
Oct 15, 2003* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Massu #21 7-6(2) 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #102 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 218 217 50.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2000 23–21 52.3% #87 1,640 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,627 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,861 0 3 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2004 30–27 52.6% #19 1,738 0 4 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,641 0 4 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,728 0 5 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,619 0 5 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2008 6–11 35.3% #77 1,583 0 5 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,590 0 5 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,557 0 5 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,551 0 5 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 5 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 5 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7