H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Massu vs James Blake H2H: 2-1
Nicolas Massu holds a 2–1 lead over James Blake in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Nicolas Massu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, James Blake won the 2008 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | James Blake | 6-3 6-2 6-2 | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
| May 10, 2007* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Massu | 7-6(3) 7-5 | James Blake | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2001* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Massu | 6-4 6-4 | James Blake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Massu | #1,015 | #9 | 1,845 | 1,900 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| James Blake | #1,020 | #4 | 3,550 | 2,048 | 345 | 235 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Massu | James Blake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #682 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #87 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #56 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #28 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #19 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #44 | 1,728 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 57–21 | 73.1% | #4 | 2,000 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2007 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #78 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,888 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2009 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #44 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,557 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #135 | 1,759 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #450 | 1,551 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #59 | 1,841 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,788 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #876 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #153 | 1,714 | 0 | 10 |