H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 1-3

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 3–1 lead over Nicolas Massu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Massu won the 2006 New Haven fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 25, 2006* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Massu #40 6-3 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #15 Match data
Jan 14, 2006* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard Jarkko Nieminen #29 6-3 7-6(4) Nicolas Massu #65 Match data
Oct 13, 2005* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #30 7-6(1) 6-2 Nicolas Massu #45 Match data
Jan 21, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #37 6-1 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 Nicolas Massu #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 218 217 50.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu Jarkko Nieminen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2000 23–21 52.3% #87 1,640 0 0 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,627 0 0 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,861 0 3 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0
24 2004 30–27 52.6% #19 1,738 0 4 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,641 0 4 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,728 0 5 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,619 0 5 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1
28 2008 6–11 35.3% #77 1,583 0 5 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,590 0 5 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,557 0 5 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,551 0 5 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 5 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 5 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2