H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nicolas Massu vs Kristof Vliegen H2H: 1-1
Nicolas Massu and Kristof Vliegen are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Massu leads 1–0 on clay, while Kristof Vliegen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristof Vliegen won the 2006 Stockholm third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kristof Vliegen | 6-2 6-4 | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2004* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Massu | 6-3 6-4 | Kristof Vliegen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Massu | #1,015 | #9 | 1,845 | 1,900 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Kristof Vliegen | #452 | #30 | 1,008 | 1,798 | 83 | 114 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Massu | Kristof Vliegen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #87 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #116 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #56 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #116 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #93 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #19 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #98 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #44 | 1,728 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #78 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #257 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,557 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #450 | 1,551 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #876 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |