H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nicolas Massu vs Michael Chang H2H: 0-1
Michael Chang holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Massu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Chang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 2000 Shanghai quarterfinal 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2000* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Michael Chang | 7-5 6-3 | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Massu | #1,015 | #9 | 1,845 | 1,900 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Massu | Michael Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 |
| 20 | 2000 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #87 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 |
| 22 | 2002 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #56 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 |
| 24 | 2004 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #19 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 |
| 25 | 2005 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #44 | 1,728 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 |
| 27 | 2007 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #78 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 |
| 28 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 |
| 29 | 2009 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,557 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 |
| 31 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #450 | 1,551 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #876 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |