H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 2-2

Nicolas Massu and Mikhail Youzhny are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Nicolas Massu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2006 US Open second round 5-7 6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #54 5-7 6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 6-0 Nicolas Massu #41 Match data
Aug 4, 2004* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #46 6-3 3-6 6-3 Nicolas Massu #13 Match data
Apr 26, 2001* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Massu #68 6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #75 Match data
Oct 20, 2000* Shanghai ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Massu #73 7-6(14) 6-1 Mikhail Youzhny #131 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 218 217 50.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2000 23–21 52.3% #87 1,640 0 0 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,627 0 0 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,861 0 3 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2004 30–27 52.6% #19 1,738 0 4 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,641 0 4 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,728 0 5 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,619 0 5 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2008 6–11 35.3% #77 1,583 0 5 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,590 0 5 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,557 0 5 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,551 0 5 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 5 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 5 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10