H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nicolas Massu vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Massu holds a 1–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Massu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Massu won the 2002 Indianapolis second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2011 | Atlanta | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Rajeev Ram | 6-3 7-6(5) | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2002 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Massu | 6-3 6-3 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Massu | #1,015 | #9 | 1,845 | 1,900 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Massu | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #87 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #56 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #19 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #44 | 1,728 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2007 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #78 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2009 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,557 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #450 | 1,551 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #876 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |