H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Massu vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 3-1
Nicolas Massu holds a 3–1 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Massu leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Massu won the 2005 Wimbledon first round 7-6(7) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nicolas Massu | 7-6(7) 6-3 6-4 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sargis Sargsian | 6-7(6) 6-4 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2003* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nicolas Massu | 6-2 6-2 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2000* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nicolas Massu | 6-2 6-3 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Massu | #1,015 | #9 | 1,845 | 1,900 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Massu | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #87 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #56 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #19 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #44 | 1,728 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2007 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #78 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2009 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,557 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #450 | 1,551 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #876 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |