H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs Sjeng Schalken H2H: 0-1

Sjeng Schalken holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Massu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2000 Hong Kong Open round of 32 6-4 7-6(3).

CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sjeng Schalken #54 6-4 7-6(3) Nicolas Massu #73 Match data Oct 5, 2000* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 226 219 50.8% 0 1 0 0 1 4 6
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu Sjeng Schalken
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2
20 2000 24–22 52.2% #87 1,648 0 0 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,629 0 0 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,860 0 3 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5
24 2004 36–27 57.1% #19 1,796 0 5 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,633 0 5 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,727 0 6 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,618 0 6 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9
28 2008 7–12 36.8% #77 1,598 0 6 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,595 0 6
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,559 0 6
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,552 0 6
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 6
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Massu Sjeng Schalken
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 2000 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
21 2001 13 14 27 48.1% 6 12 18 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 2002 12 11 23 52.2% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2003 9 7 16 56.3% 24 10 34 70.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
26 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 25 12 37 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2007 1 8 9 11.1% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4%
30 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2011 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2012 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2013 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 74 90 164 45.1% 139 108 247 56.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 7 10 17 41.2% 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 396/444 of Nicolas Massu's and 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Massu Sjeng Schalken
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 —/— 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7%
18 1998 2/2 3.5 3.0 62.9% 67.9% 37.4% 52.8% 6.3% 56.4% 30.9% 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9%
19 —/— 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5%
20 2000 36/46 4.4 3.1 54.6% 71.1% 50.7% 57.5% 39.3% 61.5% 35.8% 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9%
21 2001 43/48 5.4 2.5 55.0% 68.0% 48.1% 55.8% 42.2% 59.1% 34.0% 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9%
22 2002 33/46 4.7 3.2 57.9% 71.2% 52.7% 61.0% 45.3% 63.3% 42.1% 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0%
23 2003 49/55 4.2 3.1 60.2% 69.8% 50.7% 53.7% 49.4% 62.1% 42.0% 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7%
24 2004 57/63 4.1 2.5 58.7% 72.0% 52.1% 63.5% 41.7% 63.5% 40.9% 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6%
25 2005 36/37 4.7 3.6 56.1% 70.3% 47.3% 62.5% 34.6% 60.0% 34.6% 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3%
26 2006 60/60 4.8 2.6 59.0% 71.1% 53.4% 58.3% 45.4% 63.7% 37.8% 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7%
27 2007 32/37 3.9 2.9 60.6% 66.3% 49.3% 58.7% 38.9% 59.6% 34.8% 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1%
28 2008 17/19 3.7 3.1 60.1% 68.6% 48.6% 50.5% 34.1% 60.5% 37.0% 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4%
29 2009 18/18 4.1 4.1 60.6% 64.1% 47.1% 59.5% 53.5% 57.4% 36.3% —/—
30 2010 10/10 3.5 4.0 63.4% 66.9% 46.6% 65.6% 50.2% 59.1% 36.4% —/—
31 2011 1/1 1.0 1.0 63.8% 60.0% 50.0% 66.7% 28.6% 56.4% 37.3% —/—
32 2012 1/1 3.0 4.0 64.3% 55.6% 25.0% 58.3% 44.6% 21.6% —/—
33 2013 1/1 2.0 10.0 62.6% 62.3% 50.0% 71.4% 33.3% 57.7% 35.6% —/—
Career 396/445 4.4 3.0 58.3% 69.7% 50.3% 58.7% 42.6% 61.4% 37.8% 466/534 3.8 3.4 62.5% 69.2% 51.3% 56.7% 44.1% 62.1% 38.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Massu Sjeng Schalken
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1997 1489 102.8 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 0.00 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% 42.9% -0.57 0–1 +0.03
18 1998 1471 102.0 -0.63 -3.54 0.709 44.1% 0.0% -3.00 -0.04 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) +0.54
19 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) +0.30
20 2000 1649 128.9 -0.30 -1.80 0.930 49.0% -54 +24 -100 51.5% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 7–6 (54%) +0.82 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) -1.14
21 2001 1629 130.4 -2.10 -2.58 0.831 46.8% +22 -58 -46 45.1% -0.53 11–9 (55%) 13–13 (50%) -0.30 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) +1.65
22 2002 1752 141.7 +1.09 +3.69 1.148 52.8% -42 -1 -192 59.6% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 11–8 (58%) -0.54 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) -2.44
23 2003 1861 147.4 +0.30 +3.40 1.107 51.9% -79 +62 61.8% +0.69 10–9 (53%) 10–7 (59%) +0.25 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) +0.15
24 2004 1796 141.9 +1.00 +3.07 1.120 51.9% -29 +91 58.4% +0.57 5–11 (31%) 13–9 (59%) +2.36 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) +1.67
25 2005 1634 125.2 -2.10 -2.21 0.864 47.7% -5 +164 47.3% -0.38 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) +1.24 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) +0.32
26 2006 1728 142.0 +1.67 +0.64 1.044 50.8% -60 +139 54.9% +0.17 9–7 (56%) 16–10 (62%) +0.07 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) +1.00
27 2007 1619 129.9 -2.88 -1.60 0.862 47.4% -39 +129 42.7% -0.40 4–7 (36%) 9–11 (45%) +0.17 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) +1.66
28 2008 1598 127.6 -1.27 -0.06 0.936 48.3% +14 +83 41.3% -0.74 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) -0.20 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) -1.00
29 2009 1596 122.7 -3.61 -1.01 0.853 47.3% +24 +30 39.2% -0.69 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) +0.34
30 2010 1560 116.9 -1.58 -0.99 0.890 48.3% +26 37.9% -0.69 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) +0.24
31 2011 1552 98.9 +0.13 -1.79 0.856 47.5% 0.0% -1.50 0–1 +0.22
32 2012 1538 97.7 -0.61 -1.01 0.391 35.5% 0.0% -4.50 +0.11
33 2013 1526 102.0 -1.57 -1.93 0.843 47.8% 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 +0.08
Career 1900 139.2 -0.42 +0.39 0.979 49.7% -29 +74 -113 51.3% +0.03 64–73 (47%) 97–84 (54%) 99.2 +1.09 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.