H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs Tim Henman H2H: 1-5

Tim Henman holds a 5–1 lead over Nicolas Massu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2005 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #12 6-2 6-1 Nicolas Massu #31 Match data
May 5, 2005* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tim Henman #6 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Massu #21 Match data
Apr 24, 2004* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Tim Henman #7 3-6 6-4 6-3 Nicolas Massu #11 Match data
Aug 12, 2002 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #5 6-3 1-6 7-5 Nicolas Massu #66 Match data
Apr 18, 2002* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tim Henman #5 6-1 7-6(3) Nicolas Massu #65 Match data
Jan 6, 2001* Adelaide ATP 250 SF Hard Nicolas Massu #87 3-6 7-5 6-2 Tim Henman #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 218 217 50.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2000 23–21 52.3% #87 1,640 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,627 0 0 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,861 0 3 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2004 30–27 52.6% #19 1,738 0 4 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,641 0 4 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,728 0 5 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,619 0 5 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2008 6–11 35.3% #77 1,583 0 5 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,590 0 5 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,557 0 5 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,551 0 5 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 5 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 5 — — — — — — —