H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs Tomas Zib H2H: 1-1

Nicolas Massu and Tomas Zib are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Massu won the 2001 Japan Open round of 32 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tomas Zib
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Massu #79 6-3 7-6(4) Tomas Zib #203 Match data Oct 4, 2001* R32 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tomas Zib #120 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Massu #100 Match data Feb 10, 2000* R32 San Jose ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 226 219 50.8% 0 1 0 0 1 4 6
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu Tomas Zib
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2000 24–22 52.2% #87 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,629 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,860 0 3 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0
24 2004 36–27 57.1% #19 1,796 0 5 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,633 0 5 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,727 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,618 0 6 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0
28 2008 7–12 36.8% #77 1,598 0 6 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,595 0 6 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,559 0 6 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,552 0 6 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 6 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Massu Tomas Zib
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 13 14 27 48.1% 6 12 18 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 12 11 23 52.2% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2003 9 7 16 56.3% 24 10 34 70.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 25 12 37 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 1 8 9 11.1% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 74 90 164 45.1% 139 108 247 56.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 7 10 17 41.2% — 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 396/444 of Nicolas Massu's and 123/134 of Tomas Zib's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Massu Tomas Zib
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1998 2/2 3.5 3.0 62.9% 67.9% 37.4% 52.8% 6.3% 56.4% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 36/46 4.4 3.1 54.6% 71.1% 50.7% 57.5% 39.3% 61.5% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 43/48 5.4 2.5 55.0% 68.0% 48.1% 55.8% 42.2% 59.1% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 33/46 4.7 3.2 57.9% 71.2% 52.7% 61.0% 45.3% 63.3% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2003 49/55 4.2 3.1 60.2% 69.8% 50.7% 53.7% 49.4% 62.1% 42.0% 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5%
24 2004 57/63 4.1 2.5 58.7% 72.0% 52.1% 63.5% 41.7% 63.5% 40.9% 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4%
25 2005 36/37 4.7 3.6 56.1% 70.3% 47.3% 62.5% 34.6% 60.0% 34.6% 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8%
26 2006 60/60 4.8 2.6 59.0% 71.1% 53.4% 58.3% 45.4% 63.7% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 32/37 3.9 2.9 60.6% 66.3% 49.3% 58.7% 38.9% 59.6% 34.8% 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5%
28 2008 17/19 3.7 3.1 60.1% 68.6% 48.6% 50.5% 34.1% 60.5% 37.0% 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6%
29 2009 18/18 4.1 4.1 60.6% 64.1% 47.1% 59.5% 53.5% 57.4% 36.3% 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9%
30 2010 10/10 3.5 4.0 63.4% 66.9% 46.6% 65.6% 50.2% 59.1% 36.4% 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1%
31 2011 1/1 1.0 1.0 63.8% 60.0% 50.0% 66.7% 28.6% 56.4% 37.3% 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8%
32 2012 1/1 3.0 4.0 64.3% 55.6% 25.0% 58.3% — 44.6% 21.6% 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3%
33 2013 1/1 2.0 10.0 62.6% 62.3% 50.0% 71.4% 33.3% 57.7% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 396/445 4.4 3.0 58.3% 69.7% 50.3% 58.7% 42.6% 61.4% 37.8% — 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Massu Tomas Zib
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1997 1489 102.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 1471 102.0 -0.63 -3.54 0.709 44.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1649 128.9 -0.30 -1.80 0.930 49.0% -54 +24 -100 51.5% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 1629 130.4 -2.10 -2.58 0.831 46.8% +22 -58 -46 45.1% -0.53 11–9 (55%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 1752 141.7 +1.09 +3.69 1.148 52.8% -42 -1 -192 59.6% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.54 1998 1488 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.05
23 2003 1861 147.4 +0.30 +3.40 1.107 51.9% -79 +62 — 61.8% +0.69 10–9 (53%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.25 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 — 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.15
24 2004 1796 141.9 +1.00 +3.07 1.120 51.9% -29 +91 — 58.4% +0.57 5–11 (31%) 13–9 (59%) — +2.36 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 — 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.93
25 2005 1634 125.2 -2.10 -2.21 0.864 47.7% -5 +164 — 47.3% -0.38 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.24 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.84
26 2006 1728 142.0 +1.67 +0.64 1.044 50.8% -60 +139 — 54.9% +0.17 9–7 (56%) 16–10 (62%) — +0.07 2002 1446 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 1619 129.9 -2.88 -1.60 0.862 47.4% -39 +129 — 42.7% -0.40 4–7 (36%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.17 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 — — 21.4% -2.14 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.14
28 2008 1598 127.6 -1.27 -0.06 0.936 48.3% +14 +83 — 41.3% -0.74 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.20 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 — 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.23
29 2009 1596 122.7 -3.61 -1.01 0.853 47.3% +24 +30 — 39.2% -0.69 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.34 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.40
30 2010 1560 116.9 -1.58 -0.99 0.890 48.3% — +26 — 37.9% -0.69 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.24 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.86
31 2011 1552 98.9 +0.13 -1.79 0.856 47.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.22 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
32 2012 1538 97.7 -0.61 -1.01 0.391 35.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.11 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.06
33 2013 1526 102.0 -1.57 -1.93 0.843 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.08 2009 1544 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1900 139.2 -0.42 +0.39 0.979 49.7% -29 +74 -113 51.3% +0.03 64–73 (47%) 97–84 (54%) 99.2 +1.09 — 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.