H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 1-3

Tommy Robredo holds a 3–1 lead over Nicolas Massu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2008 Indian Wells Open second round 6-4 5-7 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Robredo #15 6-4 5-7 7-6(5) Nicolas Massu #102 Match data Mar 16, 2008* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Nicolas Massu #43 6-4 6-4 Tommy Robredo #22 Match data Mar 22, 2006* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Robredo #17 6-2 6-0 6-2 Nicolas Massu #11 Match data May 30, 2004* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tommy Robredo #54 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Massu #76 Match data Jul 12, 2001* R32 Swedish Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 226 219 50.8% 0 1 0 0 1 4 6
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,051 525 353 59.8% 0 0 1 0 1 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 2000 24–22 52.2% #87 1,648 0 0 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,793 0 1
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,629 0 0 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,760 0 1
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 2004 41–25 62.1% #13 1,831 0 2
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,860 0 3 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,851 0 2
24 2004 36–27 57.1% #19 1,796 0 5 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,867 0 4
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,633 0 5 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,727 0 6 2008 35–23 60.3% #21 1,872 0 7
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,618 0 6 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,905 0 9
28 2008 7–12 36.8% #77 1,598 0 6 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,595 0 6 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,785 0 10
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,559 0 6 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,768 0 10
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,552 0 6 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,004 0 12
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 6 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,999 0 12
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 6 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,884 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,813 0 12
35 — — — — — — — 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 — — — — — — — 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,583 0 12
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Massu Tommy Robredo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1998 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 23 9 32 71.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2000 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2001 13 14 27 48.1% 6 12 18 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2003 10 14 24 41.7% 22 8 30 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2002 12 11 23 52.2% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 20 12 32 62.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 2003 9 7 16 56.3% 24 10 34 70.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2005 20 11 31 64.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2006 22 16 38 57.9% 22 6 28 78.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 27 13 40 67.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 25 12 37 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 12 14 26 46.2% 21 7 28 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2007 1 8 9 11.1% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 27 9 36 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 9 9 18 50.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 25 13 38 65.8% 15 12 27 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
33 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 2 3 33.3% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 74 90 164 45.1% 139 108 247 56.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 7 10 17 41.2% — 226 182 408 55.4% 256 130 386 66.3% 30 24 54 55.6% 13 17 30 43.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 396/444 of Nicolas Massu's and 853/878 of Tommy Robredo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Massu Tommy Robredo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/4 0.0 0.5 62.8% 65.2% 54.5% 55.0% 72.7% 61.7% 44.0%
18 1998 2/2 3.5 3.0 62.9% 67.9% 37.4% 52.8% 6.3% 56.4% 30.9% 2000 2/2 0.0 3.5 63.6% 62.8% 26.7% 65.7% 16.7% 49.7% 28.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 52/57 3.5 2.9 64.8% 70.5% 51.2% 58.7% 47.5% 63.6% 40.7%
20 2000 36/46 4.4 3.1 54.6% 71.1% 50.7% 57.5% 39.3% 61.5% 35.8% 2002 48/57 1.9 2.8 68.1% 63.7% 50.6% 54.5% 40.3% 59.2% 40.1%
21 2001 43/48 5.4 2.5 55.0% 68.0% 48.1% 55.8% 42.2% 59.1% 34.0% 2003 63/64 2.7 2.9 68.6% 66.9% 51.0% 52.8% 43.5% 61.9% 40.1%
22 2002 33/46 4.7 3.2 57.9% 71.2% 52.7% 61.0% 45.3% 63.3% 42.1% 2004 62/66 4.3 3.1 59.8% 71.5% 50.1% 59.9% 39.7% 63.1% 37.9%
23 2003 49/55 4.2 3.1 60.2% 69.8% 50.7% 53.7% 49.4% 62.1% 42.0% 2005 65/66 3.8 2.9 61.4% 71.2% 50.2% 58.0% 40.5% 63.0% 41.5%
24 2004 57/63 4.1 2.5 58.7% 72.0% 52.1% 63.5% 41.7% 63.5% 40.9% 2006 75/75 3.2 1.8 69.2% 68.7% 53.3% 62.1% 48.3% 63.8% 40.5%
25 2005 36/37 4.7 3.6 56.1% 70.3% 47.3% 62.5% 34.6% 60.0% 34.6% 2007 73/73 3.7 1.7 67.2% 68.6% 55.3% 58.6% 47.8% 64.1% 40.7%
26 2006 60/60 4.8 2.6 59.0% 71.1% 53.4% 58.3% 45.4% 63.7% 37.8% 2008 57/58 3.1 1.5 68.4% 69.0% 52.3% 59.2% 40.6% 63.7% 38.8%
27 2007 32/37 3.9 2.9 60.6% 66.3% 49.3% 58.7% 38.9% 59.6% 34.8% 2009 70/70 4.2 2.1 63.4% 71.5% 55.2% 61.6% 43.4% 65.5% 38.9%
28 2008 17/19 3.7 3.1 60.1% 68.6% 48.6% 50.5% 34.1% 60.5% 37.0% 2010 43/43 4.3 2.1 64.8% 69.7% 54.5% 49.4% 40.9% 63.9% 36.1%
29 2009 18/18 4.1 4.1 60.6% 64.1% 47.1% 59.5% 53.5% 57.4% 36.3% 2011 32/34 3.8 2.4 62.5% 70.7% 55.4% 61.5% 40.1% 64.9% 38.8%
30 2010 10/10 3.5 4.0 63.4% 66.9% 46.6% 65.6% 50.2% 59.1% 36.4% 2012 12/12 4.8 2.2 60.7% 70.5% 49.6% 62.9% 64.6% 62.1% 35.8%
31 2011 1/1 1.0 1.0 63.8% 60.0% 50.0% 66.7% 28.6% 56.4% 37.3% 2013 56/56 4.5 2.2 60.6% 71.6% 52.3% 59.5% 42.7% 64.0% 39.0%
32 2012 1/1 3.0 4.0 64.3% 55.6% 25.0% 58.3% — 44.6% 21.6% 2014 69/69 5.1 2.0 63.8% 74.1% 54.0% 58.1% 39.6% 66.8% 37.2%
33 2013 1/1 2.0 10.0 62.6% 62.3% 50.0% 71.4% 33.3% 57.7% 35.6% 2015 43/43 3.7 2.0 62.8% 69.8% 51.3% 57.9% 45.1% 63.1% 36.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 8/8 5.0 2.6 61.4% 65.4% 49.3% 59.3% 30.0% 58.6% 30.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 17/17 2.2 1.6 65.1% 63.1% 47.3% 60.3% 47.0% 57.5% 35.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 2/2 2.0 3.0 63.5% 76.4% 52.9% 37.5% 14.3% 67.7% 27.0%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.8% 61.3% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 52.9% 28.6%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.4% 44.8% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 42.2% 31.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Massu Tommy Robredo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1997 1489 102.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — 0.00 1999 1534 111.3 -1.11 +0.08 1.149 52.8% — +25 — 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — -0.28
18 1998 1471 102.0 -0.63 -3.54 0.709 44.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04 2000 1496 104.2 -0.33 -3.63 0.558 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1762 138.8 +1.70 +1.94 1.118 52.1% -113 +59 -142 59.9% +0.69 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — +1.44
20 2000 1649 128.9 -0.30 -1.80 0.930 49.0% -54 +24 -100 51.5% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.82 2002 1794 141.9 -1.86 +2.88 0.984 49.6% -51 +86 -168 50.0% -0.11 15–7 (68%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.25
21 2001 1629 130.4 -2.10 -2.58 0.831 46.8% +22 -58 -46 45.1% -0.53 11–9 (55%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.30 2003 1760 144.7 -0.06 +2.81 1.054 50.9% -81 +199 -70 53.8% +0.23 13–8 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.05
22 2002 1752 141.7 +1.09 +3.69 1.148 52.8% -42 -1 -192 59.6% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.54 2004 1831 146.9 +0.42 +1.52 1.025 50.4% -13 +109 -123 56.6% +0.25 17–6 (74%) 15–11 (58%) — 0.00
23 2003 1861 147.4 +0.30 +3.40 1.107 51.9% -79 +62 — 61.8% +0.69 10–9 (53%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.25 2005 1852 145.0 +0.69 +3.15 1.121 51.7% +8 +79 -187 58.9% +0.51 12–8 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — +1.57
24 2004 1796 141.9 +1.00 +3.07 1.120 51.9% -29 +91 — 58.4% +0.57 5–11 (31%) 13–9 (59%) — +2.36 2006 1868 151.1 +1.63 +3.35 1.119 52.0% -22 +147 -213 62.8% +0.78 12–12 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.81
25 2005 1634 125.2 -2.10 -2.21 0.864 47.7% -5 +164 — 47.3% -0.38 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.24 2007 1857 150.3 +1.34 +3.23 1.134 52.3% +18 +126 -200 61.5% +0.75 16–10 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — +3.75
26 2006 1728 142.0 +1.67 +0.64 1.044 50.8% -60 +139 — 54.9% +0.17 9–7 (56%) 16–10 (62%) — +0.07 2008 1873 148.9 +1.00 +2.34 1.071 51.1% -73 +190 — 55.9% +0.27 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.66
27 2007 1619 129.9 -2.88 -1.60 0.862 47.4% -39 +129 — 42.7% -0.40 4–7 (36%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.17 2009 1905 153.5 +2.25 +1.71 1.126 52.0% -15 +119 -212 60.7% +0.69 14–3 (82%) 15–5 (75%) — +2.30
28 2008 1598 127.6 -1.27 -0.06 0.936 48.3% +14 +83 — 41.3% -0.74 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.20 2010 1797 144.2 +0.33 -0.22 1.000 49.7% +33 +108 — 47.0% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.62
29 2009 1596 122.7 -3.61 -1.01 0.853 47.3% +24 +30 — 39.2% -0.69 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.34 2011 1786 146.5 +1.92 +0.31 1.105 51.8% +44 +149 — 62.2% +0.76 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.04
30 2010 1560 116.9 -1.58 -0.99 0.890 48.3% — +26 — 37.9% -0.69 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.24 2012 1768 135.0 +0.23 -0.69 0.947 49.1% +22 +146 — 51.6% -0.48 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — -0.13
31 2011 1552 98.9 +0.13 -1.79 0.856 47.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.22 2013 2004 157.9 +1.54 +1.91 1.083 51.3% -155 +67 -307 58.8% +0.55 14–4 (78%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.69
32 2012 1538 97.7 -0.61 -1.01 0.391 35.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.11 2014 1999 163.7 +2.95 +1.79 1.118 51.6% +11 -78 -165 59.1% +0.51 10–10 (50%) 24–20 (55%) — +0.70
33 2013 1526 102.0 -1.57 -1.93 0.843 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.08 2015 1885 151.8 -1.22 +0.52 0.987 49.7% +56 +17 -99 52.3% -0.03 10–7 (59%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.91
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1814 131.0 -1.43 -1.82 0.730 45.3% +32 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.56
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1741 121.5 -3.64 -0.64 0.826 46.6% +76 -4 — 36.6% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.84
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1685 121.0 -3.18 +3.15 0.838 46.8% — — — 16.7% -1.34 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.31
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1583 99.7 -0.51 -0.32 0.607 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1582 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1514 92.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1503 96.1 -0.65 -5.56 0.541 36.6% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.08
Career — 1900 139.2 -0.42 +0.39 0.979 49.7% -29 +74 -113 51.3% +0.03 64–73 (47%) 97–84 (54%) 99.2 +1.09 — 2051 153.4 +0.86 +1.96 1.064 51.0% -18 +95 -163 56.4% +0.35 169–107 (61%) 178–143 (55%) 107.1 +1.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.