H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 1-3

Tommy Robredo holds a 3–1 lead over Nicolas Massu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-4 5-7 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 16, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #15 6-4 5-7 7-6(5) Nicolas Massu #102 Match data
Mar 22, 2006* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Massu #43 6-4 6-4 Tommy Robredo #22 Match data
May 30, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #17 6-2 6-0 6-2 Nicolas Massu #11 Match data
Jul 12, 2001* Bastad ATP 250 R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #54 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Massu #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 218 217 50.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 2000 23–21 52.3% #87 1,640 0 0 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,627 0 0 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,861 0 3 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2
24 2004 30–27 52.6% #19 1,738 0 4 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,641 0 4 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,728 0 5 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,619 0 5 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9
28 2008 6–11 35.3% #77 1,583 0 5 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,590 0 5 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,557 0 5 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,551 0 5 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 5 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 5 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 — — — — — — — 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 — — — — — — — 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12