H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nicolas Pereira vs Paul Annacone H2H: 1-1
Nicolas Pereira and Paul Annacone are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Pereira leads 1–0 on clay, while Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1989 Stratton Mountain second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1989* | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Paul Annacone | 7-5 6-2 | Nicolas Pereira | Match data |
| May 4, 1988* | Forest Hills | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Nicolas Pereira | 7-5 7-6 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Pereira | #1,101 | #74 | 658 | 1,689 | 63 | 114 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Pereira | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #142 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #122 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #110 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |