H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Thomann vs Jan Kroslak

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Nicolas Thomann vs Jan Kroslak.

FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 0
0 main-draw meetings
SVK Age 51 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Thomann #223 6-2 3-6 8-6 Jan Kroslak Match data Jan 14, 2002 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Thomann #806 #106 350 1,641 14 25 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jan Kroslak 1,752 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Thomann Jan Kroslak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1995 8–11 42.1% 1,568 0 1
21 1996 13–17 43.3% 1,618 0 1
22 1997 18–13 58.1% 1,651 0 2
23 1998 9–11 45.0% 1,712 0 2
24 1997 0–2 0.0% #255 1,492 0 0 1999 13–26 33.3% 1,601 0 2
25 2000 5–10 33.3% 1,550 0 2
26 2001 1–2 33.3% 1,530 0 2
27 2000 2–2 50.0% #139 1,534 0 0
28 2001 2–5 28.6% #223 1,509 0 0
29 2002 2–4 33.3% #132 1,617 0 0
30 2003 6–4 60.0% #139 1,605 0 0
31 2004 1–4 20.0% #384 1,541 0 0
32 2005 1–2 33.3% #193 1,544 0 0
33 2006 0–2 0.0% #433 1,488 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Thomann Jan Kroslak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1995 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1996 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1997 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 12 4 16 75.0%
23 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
24 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 9 10 19 47.4% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
25 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2003 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 8 11 19 42.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 35 40 75 46.7% 6 19 25 24.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 22 22 44 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Thomann Jan Kroslak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1995 1569 121.0 +62 -74 40.0% -0.54 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 +0.61
21 1996 1618 128.6 +14 +9 43.2% -0.57 5–3 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 101.5 +0.45
22 1997 1652 123.1 +54 -152 50.6% -0.03 8–2 (80%) 6–6 (50%) 105.5 +1.83
23 1998 1713 142.4 +31 -206 44.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 -2.07
24 1997 1493 112.7 -3.14 +3.57 0.936 48.5% 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–2 -0.33 1999 1601 119.9 +82 -174 -57 37.4% -1.08 5–5 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.3 +0.88
25 2000 1550 107.6 +46 -123 36.1% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.3 +1.07
26 2001 1530 107.6 33.3% -0.50 0–1 +0.31
27 2000 1535 119.3 +1.01 -0.41 1.032 50.5% +30 55.6% -0.11 0–1 2–0 -0.24 2002 1494 97.5
28 2001 1510 108.4 +0.92 -1.21 0.910 48.6% +33 -12 36.8% -0.84 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 +0.28
29 2002 1618 119.2 +1.85 -1.64 1.044 50.2% -26 36.8% -0.84 1–1 1–1 +0.09
30 2003 1606 115.0 +1.21 -0.34 1.110 51.4% +34 66.7% +0.71 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 +0.65
31 2004 1541 106.6 -0.24 -2.35 0.710 45.3% +102 33.3% -1.50 0–2 3–1 (75%) -0.36
32 2005 1545 109.8 -1.02 -0.29 1.033 49.7% 33.3% -1.17 1–1 -0.09
33 2006 1488 97.2 -3.61 -1.79 0.761 43.9% 0.0% -3.50 -0.13
Career 1641 120.3 +0.36 -0.80 0.963 49.2% +32 -12 42.1% -0.65 3–9 (25%) 10–8 (56%) 96.8 -0.33 1753 128.2 +49 -155 -20 42.2% -0.60 26–17 (60%) 29–28 (51%) 106.4 +1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.