H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nikola Pilic vs Fred Stolle H2H: 3-1
Nikola Pilic holds a 3–1 lead over Fred Stolle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nikola Pilic leads 2–0 on carpet, while Fred Stolle leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikola Pilic won the 1972 Gothenberg Wct third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1972* | Gothenberg Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nikola Pilic | 6-3 6-2 | Fred Stolle | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1971* | Quebec Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nikola Pilic | 7-6 6-4 | Fred Stolle | Match data |
| Nov 29, 1969* | Stockholm Open | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Nikola Pilic | 7-9 12-10 6-2 | Fred Stolle | Match data |
| Jul 12, 1968* | Paris 2 | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Fred Stolle | 2-6 9-11 6-1 6-4 7-5 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Fred Stolle | #555 | #30 | 0 | 1,923 | 177 | 168 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikola Pilic | Fred Stolle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 28 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 48–31 | 60.8% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 19–23 | 45.2% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 24–26 | 48.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 22–29 | 43.1% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,772 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,754 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #305 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,734 | 0 | 6 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 6 |