H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nikola Pilic vs Graham Stilwell H2H: 5-0
Nikola Pilic holds a 5–0 lead over Graham Stilwell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nikola Pilic leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikola Pilic won the 1972 Boston Wct third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 1972* | Boston Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nikola Pilic | 6-4 6-4 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
| Oct 20, 1971* | Cologne Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nikola Pilic | 7-6 7-6 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1971* | Midland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Nikola Pilic | 6-4 7-5 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1970* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Nikola Pilic | 6-1 6-4 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1970* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Nikola Pilic | 6-1 10-8 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Graham Stilwell | #62 | #62 | 0 | 1,734 | 97 | 181 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikola Pilic | Graham Stilwell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 15–28 | 34.9% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–32 | 22.0% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 10–27 | 27.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 15–33 | 31.2% | #109 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #128 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #83 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |