H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nikola Pilic vs Tom Edlefsen H2H: 1-1
Nikola Pilic and Tom Edlefsen are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tom Edlefsen leads 1–0 on clay, while Nikola Pilic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tom Edlefsen won the 1971 Washington Wct second round 7-5 0-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 84
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 1971* | Washington Wct | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Tom Edlefsen | 7-5 0-6 6-3 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1970* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Nikola Pilic | 6-4 6-3 | Tom Edlefsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Tom Edlefsen | #172 | #94 | 0 | 1,734 | 109 | 147 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikola Pilic | Tom Edlefsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 26–25 | 51.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #111 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #118 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |