H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Agustin Calleri H2H: 5-0

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 5–0 lead over Agustin Calleri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2008 US Open second round 6-4 6-4 7-6(2).

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-4 6-4 7-6(2) Agustin Calleri #49 Match data
Aug 27, 2006* New Haven ATP 250 F Hard Nikolay Davydenko #7 6-4 6-3 Agustin Calleri #32 Match data
Jul 15, 2006* Bastad ATP 250 SF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-3 6-3 Agustin Calleri #54 Match data
Jan 13, 2006* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 6-4 7-6(4) Agustin Calleri #51 Match data
Apr 13, 2003* Estoril ATP 250 F Clay Nikolay Davydenko #61 6-4 6-3 Agustin Calleri #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Agustin Calleri #894 #16 1,405 1,902 199 182 52.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Agustin Calleri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 1999 3–3 50.0% #140 1,537 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2000 11–5 68.8% #62 1,752 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2001 11–16 40.7% #67 1,659 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2002 25–23 52.1% #50 1,722 0 0
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2003 33–23 58.9% #24 1,726 0 1
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2004 19–17 52.8% #58 1,690 0 1
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2005 21–21 50.0% #51 1,665 0 1
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2006 30–19 61.2% #29 1,800 0 2
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2007 23–24 48.9% #42 1,736 0 2
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2008 20–21 48.8% #60 1,654 0 2
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2009 3–10 23.1% #391 1,576 0 2
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21