H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Albert Costa H2H: 2-3

Albert Costa holds a 3–2 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2005 Monte Carlo Masters third round 7-6(2) 6-3.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 14, 2005* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #15 7-6(2) 6-3 Albert Costa #54 Match data
Apr 7, 2005* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Clay Albert Costa #57 7-6(2) 1-6 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #15 Match data
Jul 17, 2004* Stuttgart ATP 250 QF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #63 6-3 6-4 Albert Costa #52 Match data
Apr 16, 2003* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Albert Costa #7 6-2 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #44 Match data
May 31, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Albert Costa #22 7-5 7-6(4) 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Albert Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21