H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nikolay Davydenko vs Alberto Martin H2H: 2-1
Nikolay Davydenko holds a 2–1 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2009 Umag fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2009* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-2 6-3 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2006* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-4 6-1 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2002* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alberto Martin | 6-4 4-2 (ret.) | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikolay Davydenko | Alberto Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |