H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Donald Young H2H: 1-0

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 1–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nikolay Davydenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2007 New Haven round of 32 6-2 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Donald Young
USA Age 37 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-2 4-6 7-5 Donald Young #229 Match data Aug 22, 2007* R32 New Haven International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,221 470 329 58.8% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Donald Young #1,350 #38 1,039 1,932 125 188 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Donald Young
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–7 0.0% #553 1,402 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 0–3 0.0% #494 1,380 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 3–3 50.0% #100 1,423 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 8–20 28.6% #138 1,485 0 0
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 2009 0–4 0.0% #194 1,522 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,569 0 0 2010 3–6 33.3% #127 1,555 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,602 0 0 2011 19–17 52.8% #39 1,800 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2012 5–24 17.2% #190 1,587 0 0
23 2004 32–29 52.5% #28 1,756 0 4 2013 2–3 40.0% #96 1,696 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,869 0 5 2014 18–21 46.2% #57 1,759 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,970 0 10 2015 21–22 48.8% #48 1,828 0 0
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,937 0 11 2016 18–21 46.2% #88 1,800 0 0
27 2008 52–21 71.2% #5 1,990 0 14 2017 25–22 53.2% #61 1,786 0 0
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,152 0 19 2018 3–12 20.0% #248 1,727 0 0
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,911 0 20 2019 0–2 0.0% #230 1,648 0 0
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,840 0 21 — — — — — — —
31 2012 24–25 49.0% #44 1,842 0 21 2021 0–1 0.0% #411 1,604 0 0
32 2013 22–23 48.9% #53 1,822 0 21 — — — — — — —
33 2014 6–11 35.3% #250 1,725 0 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Donald Young
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 6 14 20 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 2000 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2002 5 11 16 31.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
22 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2012 5 14 19 26.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
23 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 21 14 35 60.0% 23 10 33 69.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2006 29 15 44 65.9% 27 9 36 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 2015 21 15 36 58.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2007 34 16 50 68.0% 14 11 25 56.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 11 15 26 42.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2008 31 15 46 67.4% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 20 15 35 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2009 29 11 40 72.5% 26 7 33 78.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2018 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 25 14 39 64.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 18 17 35 51.4% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 18 16 34 52.9% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 17 14 31 54.8% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 252 179 431 58.5% 179 114 293 61.1% 10 20 30 33.3% 29 16 45 64.4% — 103 139 242 42.6% 7 25 32 21.9% 15 24 39 38.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 774/799 of Nikolay Davydenko's and 310/313 of Donald Young's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Donald Young
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 7/7 2.0 2.6 61.8% 55.4% 43.7% 41.0% 38.9% 50.9% 32.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 1.3 4.3 54.6% 47.1% 35.8% 15.7% 4.2% 41.9% 32.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/6 5.2 4.4 56.0% 75.2% 48.1% 63.4% 33.9% 63.1% 37.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 28/28 3.1 3.4 59.1% 66.0% 48.4% 61.2% 38.5% 58.9% 34.4%
19 2000 4/4 1.3 2.5 73.5% 63.9% 47.2% 48.0% 69.2% 59.7% 42.9% 2009 4/4 3.5 3.3 54.8% 66.6% 47.1% 54.6% 38.1% 56.1% 31.9%
20 2001 18/21 3.6 2.3 62.9% 64.3% 48.8% 57.8% 50.5% 58.1% 38.8% 2010 9/9 3.7 4.0 59.6% 67.5% 46.6% 53.3% 56.3% 59.1% 36.1%
21 2002 31/36 3.2 2.8 58.7% 67.7% 46.9% 52.9% 48.2% 59.1% 38.5% 2011 36/36 2.8 3.4 63.9% 67.3% 52.8% 54.0% 44.8% 61.9% 38.8%
22 2003 58/59 2.8 2.3 66.6% 64.7% 53.0% 56.4% 39.7% 60.5% 40.8% 2012 28/29 2.1 4.1 60.4% 63.8% 41.9% 52.3% 35.2% 54.9% 37.0%
23 2004 60/61 3.3 2.7 66.2% 69.8% 49.7% 57.0% 43.6% 63.2% 40.2% 2013 5/5 2.6 4.4 64.6% 62.3% 53.6% 60.7% 48.4% 57.6% 48.2%
24 2005 81/81 3.3 2.3 67.3% 68.4% 54.3% 60.2% 45.9% 63.6% 42.7% 2014 39/39 3.1 3.7 62.4% 69.1% 50.6% 52.6% 38.9% 62.2% 38.0%
25 2006 94/95 3.2 2.1 67.9% 71.7% 54.8% 57.8% 49.3% 66.2% 44.8% 2015 43/43 3.6 4.5 55.4% 69.5% 50.3% 49.7% 38.9% 61.1% 36.9%
26 2007 82/83 3.5 3.4 67.1% 70.5% 50.0% 55.7% 49.9% 63.6% 42.5% 2016 39/39 3.6 3.7 57.6% 70.7% 51.0% 60.9% 40.9% 62.7% 37.1%
27 2008 70/73 3.9 2.2 64.5% 72.4% 53.7% 58.8% 47.3% 66.0% 43.4% 2017 46/47 4.2 4.0 60.9% 69.1% 50.0% 58.3% 45.0% 61.5% 33.4%
28 2009 74/76 3.9 2.2 68.0% 72.3% 55.4% 59.8% 42.1% 66.8% 42.6% 2018 15/15 2.7 4.4 60.3% 63.1% 48.9% 51.9% 43.4% 57.0% 33.3%
29 2010 47/48 4.1 2.5 65.5% 71.7% 51.7% 58.2% 44.6% 64.7% 41.1% 2019 2/2 1.0 2.5 59.3% 54.4% 44.2% 50.0% 17.1% 50.5% 37.2%
30 2011 50/51 1.9 3.4 70.5% 65.2% 46.7% 60.4% 46.0% 59.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 45/49 2.0 3.7 69.5% 65.6% 48.9% 62.8% 43.6% 60.4% 38.9% 2021 1/1 4.0 6.0 58.9% 65.1% 36.7% 50.0% 50.0% 53.4% 29.4%
32 2013 44/45 2.2 2.3 68.0% 66.0% 49.8% 55.6% 52.7% 60.7% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 16/17 5.0 2.8 65.7% 68.0% 51.7% 59.6% 38.5% 62.7% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 774/799 3.2 2.6 66.8% 69.1% 51.8% 58.1% 46.2% 63.3% 41.6% — 310/313 3.2 3.9 59.8% 67.4% 49.2% 54.7% 40.7% 60.0% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Donald Young
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1483 94.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1402 94.5 -5.39 -2.99 0.671 41.9% +21 — — 0.0% -3.27 — 0–2 — +0.58
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1381 91.8 -3.44 -2.20 0.550 36.6% +7 — — 12.5% -4.00 — — — +0.11
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1424 114.0 -0.74 +1.71 1.007 49.9% +6 — — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.03
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1486 119.6 -3.47 -1.98 0.836 47.1% +9 -17 +42 33.8% -1.07 3–4 (43%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.92
19 2000 1544 104.3 -1.64 +0.78 1.066 51.2% — +30 — 54.5% +0.27 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.33 2009 1522 111.1 -0.60 -1.54 0.727 44.6% +11 — — 18.2% -2.09 0–1 1–0 — -0.14
20 2001 1569 116.8 -2.27 +0.61 0.927 48.4% -9 -6 — 34.6% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.45 2010 1556 118.9 -1.42 -0.33 0.883 48.4% +27 — — 34.8% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — -0.09
21 2002 1602 132.7 -1.99 +0.74 0.940 49.0% -42 +8 — 40.5% -0.56 3–7 (30%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.81 2011 1801 137.2 -0.51 +1.10 1.019 50.0% +33 — -239 49.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) — +2.05
22 2003 1595 135.6 -1.54 +3.36 1.035 50.5% -29 +82 — 51.1% +0.01 6–9 (40%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.03 2012 1588 122.1 -6.32 +0.15 0.820 45.9% +58 -147 -95 27.8% -1.51 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.45
23 2004 1757 148.6 +0.29 +3.41 1.090 51.3% -45 +23 -353 52.7% +0.25 9–12 (43%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.87 2013 1696 130.6 -1.46 +1.87 1.137 52.9% +51 — — 30.0% -0.20 — — — -0.08
24 2005 1870 156.9 +1.31 +5.31 1.173 52.9% -23 +61 — 66.1% +1.13 9–9 (50%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.31 2014 1760 144.1 -1.19 +1.54 1.003 50.0% -2 -165 -294 46.0% -0.18 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.24
25 2006 1970 161.2 +3.54 +6.86 1.324 54.9% +29 +78 -575 67.0% +1.42 14–11 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.78 2015 1829 152.7 -2.57 +1.65 0.948 49.2% +46 -252 -393 47.7% -0.19 8–5 (62%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.51
26 2007 1938 157.3 +1.04 +5.62 1.167 52.8% +33 -5 -412 65.2% +0.94 12–13 (48%) 21–13 (62%) — +2.69 2016 1801 143.0 -1.36 +0.89 0.994 50.0% +6 -187 -184 44.7% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.47
27 2008 1991 164.4 +2.51 +6.85 1.278 54.2% +45 +72 — 69.1% +1.33 12–9 (57%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.49 2017 1786 149.2 -1.67 -1.82 0.865 48.1% +15 -212 -63 47.2% -0.47 8–5 (62%) 12–4 (75%) — -0.96
28 2009 2152 167.7 +3.74 +6.04 1.281 54.2% 0 +7 -562 73.2% +1.46 12–8 (60%) 18–5 (78%) — -0.83 2018 1727 131.1 -4.14 -0.47 0.774 45.1% +69 — — 22.2% -1.86 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.41
29 2010 1911 158.1 +1.52 +4.28 1.164 52.6% +58 +155 -313 60.3% +0.97 7–4 (64%) 8–15 (35%) — +1.11 2019 1649 106.1 -2.97 +1.63 0.752 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.14
30 2011 1840 158.1 -1.82 +3.60 1.017 50.4% +49 +79 — 50.0% +0.23 5–5 (50%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.67 2020 1629 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 1842 153.9 -2.03 +2.70 0.981 49.8% +56 -27 -236 54.9% +0.13 6–11 (35%) 8–4 (67%) — -1.90 2021 1604 96.3 -1.00 +0.69 0.631 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.13
32 2013 1822 155.8 -1.72 +3.00 1.007 50.3% +62 -78 — 49.0% +0.25 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.22 2022 1574 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1725 133.3 -1.67 -1.88 0.875 48.4% +111 -45 — 35.9% -0.62 2–1 (67%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.17 2023 1533 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2222 160.3 +0.75 +4.53 1.132 52.2% +22 +36 -405 59.3% +0.71 107–104 (51%) 129–121 (52%) 95.5 -0.42 — 1933 139.0 -2.33 +0.16 0.907 48.3% +26 -163 -164 39.9% -0.68 41–45 (48%) 51–54 (49%) 103.1 +0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.