H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 6-0

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 6–0 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2009 New Haven fourth round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 2009* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #8 7-5 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #44 Match data
Jan 4, 2008* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #37 Match data
Jan 21, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #3 7-6(1) 6-2 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #51 Match data
Oct 26, 2006* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Carpet Nikolay Davydenko #6 6-3 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #43 Match data
Oct 14, 2006* Moscow ATP 250 SF Carpet Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-4 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #51 Match data
Feb 24, 2005* Dubai ATP 250 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #16 6-3 6-0 Fabrice Santoro #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6