H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 2-4

Feliciano Lopez holds a 4–2 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Feliciano Lopez leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2010 Rotterdam third round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 11, 2010* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 6-4 6-2 Feliciano Lopez #33 Match data
Apr 24, 2009* Barcelona ATP 500 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #8 7-6(8) 3-6 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #33 Match data
Mar 8, 2008* Dubai ATP 500 SF Hard Feliciano Lopez #41 6-4 4-6 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data
Oct 7, 2004* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Feliciano Lopez #30 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #42 Match data
Mar 4, 2004* Dubai ATP 250 R32 Hard Feliciano Lopez #32 6-4 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #52 Match data
Jun 12, 2003* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Feliciano Lopez #54 7-6(5) 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7