H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 02:15 UTC
Nikolay Davydenko vs Fernando Meligeni H2H: 1-1
Nikolay Davydenko and Fernando Meligeni are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 1–0 on carpet, while Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2002 Milan third round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2002* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nikolay Davydenko | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Fernando Meligeni | 2-6 6-2 6-3 6-4 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikolay Davydenko | Fernando Meligeni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |