H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Gilles Muller H2H: 3-1

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 3–1 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2012 Metz fourth round 7-5 6-4.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 21, 2012* Metz ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #48 7-5 6-4 Gilles Muller #66 Match data
Sep 2, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Gilles Muller #130 6-4 4-6 6-3 7-6(10) Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data
Jan 18, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #3 6-4 6-0 6-3 Gilles Muller #116 Match data
May 6, 2006* Estoril ATP 250 QF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #6 6-4 6-4 Gilles Muller #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2