H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 2-4

Guillermo Canas holds a 4–2 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Canas leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2007 Roland Garros quarterfinal 7-5 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 7, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 7-5 6-4 6-4 Guillermo Canas #22 Match data
Apr 28, 2007* Barcelona ATP 500 QF Clay Guillermo Canas #28 (w/o) Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
Jan 26, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #26 6-3 6-4 6-3 Guillermo Canas #12 Match data
Jul 17, 2004* Stuttgart ATP 250 SF Clay Guillermo Canas #70 3-6 6-1 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #63 Match data
Jun 17, 2004* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Guillermo Canas #72 6-4 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #59 Match data
Oct 11, 2001* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Guillermo Canas #21 7-6(6) 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 2,008 244 188 56.5% 0 1 0 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Guillermo Canas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,462 0 0
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,461 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,481 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,840 0 1
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,857 0 3
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,805 0 3
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,898 0 6
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,889 0 6
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 — — — — — — —
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,821 0 7
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2008 21–19 52.5% #79 1,690 0 7
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,628 0 7
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 — — — — — — —
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 — — — — — — —