H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 3-0

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 3–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2011 Dubai Tennis Championships first round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nikolay Davydenko #39 6-2 6-0 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #23 Match data Feb 23, 2011* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Nikolay Davydenko #7 6-4 7-6(3) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #47 Match data Nov 7, 2009* QF Valencia ATP 500 Hard
Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-1 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #59 Match data Oct 10, 2008* R16 Moscow International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,221 470 329 58.8% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,569 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,602 0 0 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2004 32–29 52.5% #28 1,756 0 4 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,869 0 5 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,970 0 10 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,937 0 11 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1
27 2008 52–21 71.2% #5 1,990 0 14 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,152 0 19 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,911 0 20 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,840 0 21 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2012 24–25 49.0% #44 1,842 0 21 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3
32 2013 22–23 48.9% #53 1,822 0 21 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5
33 2014 6–11 35.3% #250 1,725 0 21 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2000 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2002 5 11 16 31.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2005 21 14 35 60.0% 23 10 33 69.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2006 29 15 44 65.9% 27 9 36 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2007 34 16 50 68.0% 14 11 25 56.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 2008 31 15 46 67.4% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2009 29 11 40 72.5% 26 7 33 78.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2010 25 14 39 64.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2011 18 17 35 51.4% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2012 18 16 34 52.9% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2013 17 14 31 54.8% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2014 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 252 179 431 58.5% 179 114 293 61.1% 10 20 30 33.3% 29 16 45 64.4% — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 774/799 of Nikolay Davydenko's and 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2000 4/4 1.3 2.5 73.5% 63.9% 47.2% 48.0% 69.2% 59.7% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 18/21 3.6 2.3 62.9% 64.3% 48.8% 57.8% 50.5% 58.1% 38.8% 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3%
21 2002 31/36 3.2 2.8 58.7% 67.7% 46.9% 52.9% 48.2% 59.1% 38.5% 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2%
22 2003 58/59 2.8 2.3 66.6% 64.7% 53.0% 56.4% 39.7% 60.5% 40.8% 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1%
23 2004 60/61 3.3 2.7 66.2% 69.8% 49.7% 57.0% 43.6% 63.2% 40.2% 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7%
24 2005 81/81 3.3 2.3 67.3% 68.4% 54.3% 60.2% 45.9% 63.6% 42.7% 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9%
25 2006 94/95 3.2 2.1 67.9% 71.7% 54.8% 57.8% 49.3% 66.2% 44.8% 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9%
26 2007 82/83 3.5 3.4 67.1% 70.5% 50.0% 55.7% 49.9% 63.6% 42.5% 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4%
27 2008 70/73 3.9 2.2 64.5% 72.4% 53.7% 58.8% 47.3% 66.0% 43.4% 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7%
28 2009 74/76 3.9 2.2 68.0% 72.3% 55.4% 59.8% 42.1% 66.8% 42.6% 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8%
29 2010 47/48 4.1 2.5 65.5% 71.7% 51.7% 58.2% 44.6% 64.7% 41.1% 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7%
30 2011 50/51 1.9 3.4 70.5% 65.2% 46.7% 60.4% 46.0% 59.6% 41.1% 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0%
31 2012 45/49 2.0 3.7 69.5% 65.6% 48.9% 62.8% 43.6% 60.4% 38.9% 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0%
32 2013 44/45 2.2 2.3 68.0% 66.0% 49.8% 55.6% 52.7% 60.7% 39.6% 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7%
33 2014 16/17 5.0 2.8 65.7% 68.0% 51.7% 59.6% 38.5% 62.7% 32.6% 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0%
Career — 774/799 3.2 2.6 66.8% 69.1% 51.8% 58.1% 46.2% 63.3% 41.6% — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2000 1544 104.3 -1.64 +0.78 1.066 51.2% — +30 — 54.5% +0.27 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1569 116.8 -2.27 +0.61 0.927 48.4% -9 -6 — 34.6% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 1–6 (14%) 95.1 +0.45 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27
21 2002 1602 132.7 -1.99 +0.74 0.940 49.0% -42 +8 — 40.5% -0.56 3–7 (30%) 5–5 (50%) 98.6 -1.81 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99
22 2003 1595 135.6 -1.54 +3.36 1.035 50.5% -29 +82 — 51.1% +0.01 6–9 (40%) 12–9 (57%) 98.3 -0.03 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39
23 2004 1757 148.6 +0.29 +3.41 1.090 51.3% -45 +23 -353 52.7% +0.25 9–12 (43%) 8–14 (36%) 95.2 -1.87 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42
24 2005 1870 156.9 +1.31 +5.31 1.173 52.9% -23 +61 — 66.1% +1.13 9–9 (50%) 11–8 (58%) 99.7 +0.31 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03
25 2006 1970 161.2 +3.54 +6.86 1.324 54.9% +29 +78 -575 67.0% +1.42 14–11 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 100.2 +0.78 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38
26 2007 1938 157.3 +1.04 +5.62 1.167 52.8% +33 -5 -412 65.2% +0.94 12–13 (48%) 21–13 (62%) 99.0 +2.69 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24
27 2008 1991 164.4 +2.51 +6.85 1.278 54.2% +45 +72 — 69.1% +1.33 12–9 (57%) 11–9 (55%) 98.1 +1.49 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40
28 2009 2152 167.7 +3.74 +6.04 1.281 54.2% 0 +7 -562 73.2% +1.46 12–8 (60%) 18–5 (78%) 106.3 -0.83 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22
29 2010 1911 158.1 +1.52 +4.28 1.164 52.6% +58 +155 -313 60.3% +0.97 7–4 (64%) 8–15 (35%) 93.3 +1.11 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76
30 2011 1840 158.1 -1.82 +3.60 1.017 50.4% +49 +79 — 50.0% +0.23 5–5 (50%) 7–10 (41%) 94.2 -2.67 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86
31 2012 1842 153.9 -2.03 +2.70 0.981 49.8% +56 -27 -236 54.9% +0.13 6–11 (35%) 8–4 (67%) 97.2 -1.90 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50
32 2013 1822 155.8 -1.72 +3.00 1.007 50.3% +62 -78 — 49.0% +0.25 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 100.5 -1.22 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68
33 2014 1725 133.3 -1.67 -1.88 0.875 48.4% +111 -45 — 35.9% -0.62 2–1 (67%) 5–7 (42%) 98.1 -0.17 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2222 160.3 +0.75 +4.53 1.132 52.2% +22 +36 -405 59.3% +0.71 107–104 (51%) 129–121 (52%) 95.5 -0.42 — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.