H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Igor Andreev H2H: 3-2

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 3–2 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2010 Kuala Lumpur fourth round 7-6(5) 5-7 6-3.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 1, 2010* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 R16 Hard Igor Andreev #102 7-6(5) 5-7 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Feb 12, 2009* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-3 6-2 Igor Andreev #22 Match data
Apr 26, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 4-6 7-5 Igor Andreev #32 Match data
Oct 13, 2007* Moscow ATP 250 QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 7-5 7-5 Igor Andreev #36 Match data
Sep 11, 2003* Bucharest ATP 250 R32 Clay Igor Andreev #121 7-5 6-7(1) 6-0 Nikolay Davydenko #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Igor Andreev #1,011 #18 2,490 1,913 219 214 50.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Igor Andreev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2004 25–26 49.0% #50 1,660 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,832 0 3
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,760 0 3
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2008 38–27 58.5% #19 1,882 0 3
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,693 0 3
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21