H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 7-1

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 7–1 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2012 Metz quarterfinal 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-0.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 22, 2012* Metz ATP 250 QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #48 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-0 Ivo Karlovic #90 Match data
May 8, 2012* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #54 7-6(4) 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #60 Match data
Jan 7, 2011* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #22 6-3 7-5 Ivo Karlovic #73 Match data
Jan 8, 2010* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 7-6(4) 7-6(7) Ivo Karlovic #37 Match data
Apr 15, 2009* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #9 6-4 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #26 Match data
Apr 27, 2006* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Ivo Karlovic #56 6-7(7) 7-5 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Jan 18, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #5 7-5 4-6 3-6 7-5 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #67 Match data
Jan 6, 2005* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #28 7-6(7) 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8