H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs James Blake H2H: 1-7

James Blake holds a 7–1 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, James Blake leads 6–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2012 Miami Masters first round 4-6 6-4 6-4.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 7
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 23, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #40 4-6 6-4 6-4 James Blake #69 Match data
May 8, 2009* Estoril ATP 250 SF Clay James Blake #16 6-7(3) 7-6(2) 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #11 Match data
Aug 18, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard James Blake #8 6-4 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data
Nov 13, 2006 Masters Cup ATP Finals RR Hard James Blake #8 2-6 6-4 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #3 Match data
Jan 14, 2006* Sydney ATP 250 SF Hard James Blake #23 6-4 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Mar 9, 2005* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard James Blake #151 6-3 7-6(6) Nikolay Davydenko #15 Match data
Feb 15, 2003* San Jose ATP 250 QF Hard James Blake #24 7-5 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #60 Match data
Aug 30, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard James Blake #26 6-3 4-6 6-1 6-3 (ret.) Nikolay Davydenko #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,048 345 235 59.5% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko James Blake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1998 0–1 0.0% #682 1,491 0 0
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,452 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,796 0 1
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 2,000 0 8
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,911 0 10
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2008 40–20 66.7% #10 1,888 0 10
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,848 0 10
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,841 0 10
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,788 0 10
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,714 0 10