H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Jan Hernych H2H: 5-2

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 5–2 lead over Jan Hernych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Jan Hernych leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2009 US Open second round 6-4 6-1 6-2.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 2
7 main draw meetings
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #8 6-4 6-1 6-2 Jan Hernych #70 Match data
Mar 7, 2008* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-1 6-4 Jan Hernych #188 Match data
Feb 21, 2008* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 6-3 Jan Hernych #164 Match data
Mar 11, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 6-1 Jan Hernych #73 Match data
Apr 13, 2006* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Clay Jan Hernych #85 7-5 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Feb 23, 2006* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 6-3 6-3 Jan Hernych #84 Match data
Mar 9, 2004* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Jan Hernych #171 2-6 6-4 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Jan Hernych #1,606 #59 1,157 1,780 79 115 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Jan Hernych
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #272 1,485 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,475 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2004 9–12 42.9% #83 1,570 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2005 18–22 45.0% #74 1,622 0 0
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2006 17–20 45.9% #75 1,665 0 0
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2007 7–15 31.8% #156 1,611 0 0
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2008 4–8 33.3% #81 1,676 0 0
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2009 11–23 32.4% #113 1,666 0 0
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2010 0–1 0.0% #241 1,597 0 0
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2011 3–2 60.0% #168 1,664 0 0
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2012 2–1 66.7% #193 1,598 0 0
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2013 5–5 50.0% #219 1,743 0 0
34 2014 1–1 50.0% #199 1,701 0 0
35 2015 2–2 50.0% #286 1,696 0 0
36 2016 0–1 0.0% #424 1,641 0 0