H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nikolay Davydenko vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 0-2
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 2–0 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2003 Madrid Masters second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2003* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-3 6-3 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2002* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-1 7-5 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikolay Davydenko | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |